March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

1917 – War on the Run

In the Sam Mendes directed film 1917, life for two soldiers in The Great War, moves in real time from a quiet respite under the shade of a tree to an all out sprint to save 1,600 comrades from massacre.

For almost all of its 119 minute runtime 1917 presents the misery and challenge of war by following Lance Corporal Blake and Lance Corporal Schofield who are ordered to travel cross-country on foot to deliver a message to a Brigade about to advance into a deadly trap.

The trek of Dean-Charles Chapman (Game of Thrones, The Commuter) as Blake and George Mackey (Captain Fantastic) as Scofield is shown as if taken in a single shot sequence.

Academy Award Winners Cinematographer Roger Deakens, and Production Designer Dennis Gassner team up for third time in 1917 (Blade Runner 2049, Skyfall being the first two).  The viewer is put along side the two soldiers – seeing only what they see. The result is visually breathtaking.

1917 works in great part because of the storyline and dialogue – by screenwriters Sam Mendes and Christy Wilson-Cairns. They provide you a means to care for two people you know absolutely nothing about, whom you first meet while they are resting under a tree, and with no backstory whatsoever.

The film score for 1917 is from Thomas Newman.  Newman (The Shawshank Redemption, The Horse Whisperer) has been nominated for an Oscar 15 times without coming away the winner.  The music in 1917 is wonderful and perfectly fitted to each scene.

Judy- Fascinating & Sad Watch

Judy Garland the Actress is the epitome of the very best and very worst of the Hollywood Studio System in the 20th Century.

Dorothy Gale & The Wizard of QZ and a women who effectively dies alone at 47.

Judy, the film starring Renée Zellweger presents Garland in the last year of her life.  While the film Judy is not necessarily depressing or a downer – it is sobering.

Zellweger is superb as Garland on every single front.  Zellweger as Garland can sing with swagger and also be a completely unreliable pain in the ass with a mean streak.

The surrounding story foundation and characters are adequate (at best) to provide the back-story and foundation for the premise of the film.  Jesse Buckley as Garland’s handler while in London is very good, but this movie is all about Zellweger as Garland.

Little Women Version 8 – It is The Best.

How many times can or should a story be filmed or refilmed for theatrical release on Broadcast T.V. or in Theatres?

Little Women based on the novel by Louisa May Alcott has eight versions created for Television or Theatrical film Release.

The versions: 1918,1933,1949, 1978, 1994, 2017, 2018 and 2019.

I read the novel in High School and fell in love with the story. My favorites in terms of visual story-telling were the 1933 and 1994 incarnations – with 1994 winning by a nose.

That was until I viewed the 2019 release. If the horse-racing metaphor is continued, the 2019 version wins by a 1/4 length.  So why?

Writer Director Greta Gerwig and Actress Saoirse Ronan are at the top of my I Will Go See Anything They Are Involved With List.  If Gerwig Players Group Members Tracy Letts and Timothée Chalamet are in the film – its result can only be improved.  If the Actor who can play any role as good as can be performed – Meryl Streep – happens to be included – you need to see the film – do not ask questions. If Chris Cooper is also on screen – just go to your nearest local theatre.

Little Women 2019 has as all the elements described above involved.  The strengths of Little Women 2019 far out-weigh its weaknesses.

The weakness of Little Women 2019 is in its portrayal of the happy and silly times.  The scenes seem forced and somewhat disingenuous.  In short, the Actors feel as if they are acting – not themselves.

The strength of Little Women 2019 is in its portrayal of the normal-day, challenging, stressful and desperate times.  These scenes seem genuine and real. Another strength is the Story-telling is non-linear.  This approach gives context if it works.  If not the viewer is lost.  It works in this film.